When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I own 2 Harleys: 2019 48 Special and a 2017 Wide Glide 103HO stage 1. Both bikes "require" 91 or higher. Now with the progtards in charge the war on oil and gas will once again heat up which means gas will hit at least $5/gal very soon and we're over $3 already in the soviet northwest. We don't have 91 here just 92 or 93 so I have to use the most expensive gas around. With every fill getting more painful, I have to ask why we need 91.
I understand octane ratings and have run a 1999 Dodge 318 Ram as a daily driver since 2001 which doesn't have knock sensors so I've learned a lot about gas, tuning, and octane requirements over 20 years. But my Dad has never run higher than 87 in his 02 88 Heritage and all my biker friends (non-HD) only use 87 in their Suzukis, Kawasakis, and Hondas. And none of their bikes are older than 5 years. So why on such low compression, air cooled, antique, tractor motors like these do we need high octane? I could kind of understand on my Dyna with the Stage 1 and tune needing higher octane, but at least on the Sporty EVO it shouldn't, right? What's the deal here? Thanks for any input.
All we have here is 86, 89, or 93. So I use 93. The difference in cost is so small with a Harley tank I never even think about it.
The reason for 91 requirement is compression ratio. Octane is a measure of resistance to ignition, so the more compression you have, the higher octane you would need. Harley's run north of 10:1 these days, thus the requirement.
I noted your comments about other bikes, and makes, but Harley recommends it, so I use it. Again, worrying about the cost difference is silly.
All we have here is 86, 89, or 93. So I use 93. The difference in cost is so small with a Harley tank I never even think about it.
The reason for 91 requirement is compression ratio. Octane is a measure of resistance to ignition, so the more compression you have, the higher octane you would need. Harley's run north of 10:1 these days, thus the requirement.
I noted your comments about other bikes, and makes, but Harley recommends it, so I use it. Again, worrying about the cost difference is silly.
All we have here is 86, 89, or 93. So I use 93. The difference in cost is so small with a Harley tank I never even think about it.
The reason for 91 requirement is compression ratio. Octane is a measure of resistance to ignition, so the more compression you have, the higher octane you would need. Harley's run north of 10:1 these days, thus the requirement.
I noted your comments about other bikes, and makes, but Harley recommends it, so I use it. Again, worrying about the cost difference is silly.
By adding a lot more tech and engine design They have found ways to make lower octane fuels work in high compression engines . it how ever comes at a cost. This is all nothing new. When we use to jack up small blocks we had to run high octane fuel It look a while but ways were found to make the put out more power and hold compression down. Yes Harley could be made to run on lower octane fuels but you do not want to pay the upfront cost or maintenance cost.
My 1996 Harley is designed to and runs great on 87 octane. But in the quest for more power those days ended.
simple answer: the higher the octane, the lower the chance of uncontrolled or mistimed combustion
when your vehicle doesn't need high octane, then use cheap gas....there is zero benefit to using the higher octane option...(the exception being that some suppliers only put detergents in the good stuff, in that case, it's worth it to buy the expensive stuff to get the detergents too).....when a vehicle calls for premium only, use premium only
not sure if's all HDs, but mine calls for the good stuff....and that's all it gets....when your vehicle calls for premium, it's because when tested, it tested significantly worse when fueled by low octane fuel
simple answer: the higher the octane, the lower the chance of uncontrolled or mistimed combustion
when your vehicle doesn't need high octane, then use cheap gas....there is zero benefit to using the higher octane option...(the exception being that some suppliers only put detergents in the good stuff, in that case, it's worth it to buy the expensive stuff to get the detergents too).....when a vehicle calls for premium only, use premium only
not sure if's all HDs, but mine calls for the good stuff....and that's all it gets....when your vehicle calls for premium, it's because when tested, it tested significantly worse when fueled by low octane fuel
I agree use what the owners manual says or higher. I sometimes will run 91 or 93, but my older carbed bikes run on regular 87 as per the owners manual. I havnet really noticed any discernable difference running 93. The bike doesnt go faster or anything like that.
My 04 calls for it. I really don't need it on the coast. You just need to drive like a little old lady going to church on Sunday. Stay in the correct gear and throttle slow enough for the timing and air fuel rate mixture to keep up. Mine never pings.
I have gotten as high as 51 MPG. I can get it down to high 30s MPG driving frisky and of course needs premium . Premium has same BTU or power as regular. Premium has additives to raise flash point and burn slower. Regular will explode WOT it too quickly under load. That rattles valve seats, pistons bottom end. Once in a while won't hurt it.
Last edited by Jackie Paper; Jan 29, 2021 at 12:43 PM.
My 04 calls for it. I really don't need it on the coast. You just need to drive like a little old lady going to church on Sunday. Stay in the correct gear and throttle slow enough for the timing and air fuel rate mixture to keep up. Mine never pings.
I have gotten as high as 51 MPG. I can get it down to high 30s MPG driving frisky and of course needs premium . Premium has same BTU or power as regular. Premium has additives to raise flash point and burn slower. Regular will explode WOT it too quickly under load. That rattles valve seats, pistons bottom end. Once in a while won't hurt it.
Ripsaw is that bike EFI? Reason I ask is mine didn't necessarily ping or knock that I could hear but when I strapped on my laptop and did a ride the history showed knock sensors were activated.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.