When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
But his original point is still valid. It is happening enough to be justifiably frightening for anyone who has this occur in their home. You were presented with not just one, but several verified examples.
I don't doubt that it's a frightening experience, be they real or fake cops. But I still doubt that it's happened so often as to be ingrained in the back of everyone's mind.
I don't doubt that it's a frightening experience, be they real or fake cops. But I still doubt that it's happened so often as to be ingrained in the back of everyone's mind.
I think the point he was making is simply that "police" markings on clothing and shouting from the intruders is no guarantee that they are actual law enforcement officers. Genuine distrust for the authenticity of said "officers" is a valid argument.
I think the point he was making is simply that "police" markings on clothing and shouting from the intruders is no guarantee that they are actual law enforcement officers. Genuine distrust for the authenticity of said "officers" is a valid argument.
So they should show a valid department issued photo ID at the door, just prior to, or just after tossing the stun grenade?
Tell ya what...if someone shoots a uniformed, clearly identifiable police officer and tries that defense he'll fry. I'm not talking about shooting someone he can't see because of darkness or smoke, I'm talking about shooting someone he CAN see, who is clearly wearing a police uniform, and then telling the judge that he saw it but didn't believe it because his cousins brother-in-law heard of robbers wearing cop gear one time. Good luck.
So they should show a valid department issued photo ID at the door, just prior to, or just after tossing the stun grenade?
Tell ya what...if someone shoots a uniformed, clearly identifiable police officer and tries that defense he'll fry. I'm not talking about shooting someone he can't see because of darkness or smoke, I'm talking about shooting someone he CAN see, who is clearly wearing a police uniform, and then telling the judge that he saw it but didn't believe it because his cousins brother-in-law heard of robbers wearing cop gear one time. Good luck.
Relax a little. Go back and re-read his response. This didn't just happen "one time." That was the point, not that it would be okay to shoot a clearly identifiable law enforcement officer. nobody said that.
I have some friends in Waco and when this went down they told me if they wanted to arrest David Koresh they could have done it any time he came to town,which was frequently. They were in that area a long time with no problems, untill the govt decided to incinerate them.
They make a waaay bigger deal out of the cops murdering some criminal in Ferguson,MO.
Exactly! But then they (ATF) couldn't play hero for the cameras... what a travesty and tragedy...
Relax a little. Go back and re-read his response. This didn't just happen "one time." That was the point, not that it would be okay to shoot a clearly identifiable law enforcement officer. nobody said that.
X2. And don't change the circumstances under which the argument is being made. This is not broad daylight, on Main street we're discussing, but rather, 4 in the morning storming through your door BS. I'm not anti-Blue line (that would be hilariously hypocritical), but rather, anti-Storm Trooper tactics by police or civilian law enforcement. The cases cited above speak for themselves, as do the multitude of gone-wrong no-knocks....
I am relaxed. No knocks go well 99% of the time guys.
You can continue to try to justify the Mongol shooting a cop if you'd like, I just refuse to buy into it. I hope he rots in prison.
Evidence? Back up your figure. Even so, the argument isn't the success, or applauding a killer of any sort--its about the inherent violation. Much like stating that bank robberys are successful "99% of the time." Doesn't make it right.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.