Power Vision Information Thread

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 23, 2012 | 10:50 PM

#2421

Sam2010

Outstanding HDF Member

Joined: Aug 2009

Posts: 2,858

Likes: 217

From: Puyallup Wa.

I have a copy of stage one down load that i bought when i did stage one on my 10 street glide. I think its connverted to pvt. Or what ever for power vision. PM me e mail addy. I can try to send it to you. Obvious if i figure out how to do it YOU USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. LOL.....

May 23, 2012 | 10:53 PM

#2422

Sam2010

Outstanding HDF Member

Joined: Aug 2009

Posts: 2,858

Likes: 217

From: Puyallup Wa.

Above for PHXMark cant edit on my phone.

May 23, 2012 | 11:47 PM

#2423

phxmark

6th Gear

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 13

Likes: 0

From: Glendale, AZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam2010

I have a 2004 Ultra. From what I understand, I think I can only use tunes for 2002-2005. 2006 introduced O2 sensors, EITMS and a couple of other things, and 2008 and newer are usually throttle by wire.

May 24, 2012 | 12:01 AM

#2424

Sam2010

Outstanding HDF Member

Joined: Aug 2009

Posts: 2,858

Likes: 217

From: Puyallup Wa.

Ok good luck.

May 24, 2012 | 09:13 PM

#2425

phxmark

6th Gear

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 13

Likes: 0

From: Glendale, AZ

I have a question. I have a 2004 UltraClassic with Screamin' Eagle Stage 1 Air Cleaner and Rinehart true dual exhaust. The only tune that Dynojet has on their site for this set up is a 2006. Could I use that tune or would my ECU be confused over the settings in this tune?

Thanks all.

May 24, 2012 | 10:26 PM

#2426

tubeman426

Cruiser

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 213

Likes: 3

Can anyone tell me what changing the engine displacement does, Im guessing that you can raise or lower the entire fuel curve with this setting? I have a map were the displacement is set higher than the engine it was done for and it seems to be rich across the board, I was going to lower the displacement to get it in the ballpark, what do you guys think?
Thanks...

May 25, 2012 | 01:50 AM

#2427

phxmark

6th Gear

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 13

Likes: 0

From: Glendale, AZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by tubeman426

I would believe that it does. In order to maintain what is in the AFR table, vs the volumes of the cylinders, you would have to raise or lower the entire curve. You could also change what is in the VE tables to pretty much accomplish the same thing. Right now, your entire AFR for the engine is lower than what the ECM thinks it should be. The ECM thinks you have a larger engine so it throws more fuel into the intake so now your smaller engine is running very rich.

May 25, 2012 | 01:58 AM

#2428

phxmark

6th Gear

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 13

Likes: 0

From: Glendale, AZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by iclick

First, download this tutorial on basic tuning and read through it. You can use the logs you already have in addition to others you'll create later, as the PV Tune software can load more than one log file in one tuning session. One you read through the PDF, post any questions that you may have.

Thank you much for the tutorial. It helped a lot as to what to look for.

I am tweaking my current tune little by little. I upped the AFR in the AFR table by .2 pts for the cruising ranges but left the rest alone. I will take it out for a ride tomorrow and see how things are.

I looked at the 2006 tables for the configuration that matches my bike and the tables, thought similar, have AFRs that are about .3-.4 pts above my AFRs. the VE tables are close for the fronts, but totally different on the rear cylinders. The VE tables on the 2006 are similar for front and rear and mine are way different. Probably as a result of the dynos sensor not reading the rear cylinder exhaust correctly. I was thinking just for the heck of it, copying the tables from the 2006 into my bike and see how it runs.

What is tuning? Part science, part guessing and part experimentation, RIGHT?