Power Vision Information Thread
Now to confuse matters more, when I was using another tuning program in 2008, I asked the same question. The response was don't worry about it. Chances are that you tune is already based on E10, mine is as that's all that is available where I am located.
Hopefully my thinking is correct on this.
Do I completely edit the AFR table in Win PV, and then export that to the PV to be tuned to my bike. Also, what else am I changing? I could then run autotune against the new tune. Are people using autotune or just creating custom tunes? I'm also curious what PV autotune defaults to in terms of AFR.
If yes, then what am I adjusting the current table to(I am running PV basic). I'm not to worried about mpg, i just want the performance within reason. any help understanding the step by step of creating a custom tune would help.
Honestly for something that is supposed to be simple its a bit confusing.
I can do the rest in terms of getting it from Computer to pv to bike
Now to confuse matters more, when I was using another tuning program in 2008, I asked the same question. The response was don't worry about it. Chances are that you tune is already based on E10, mine is as that's all that is available where I am located.
Hopefully my thinking is correct on this.
So with E 10 ( if im getting you ) our tunes are running a little more rich? I also dont pay enough attention to the differance between lambda and AFR based tunes because mine is lambda. So without thinking i assume everyones is....good to know.
You should be able to go into AT, fire the bike up and go into AT data collection and watch it count up hits. After it gets 50+ in idele area switch modes and look at the fron and rear change screens... I suspect you will see a large increase in VE in those cells. If so, export the map and go back into AT using the updated map.
Depending on "how close" your starting map is, the bike can run very rough untill you get a fun tuning runs in a particular area.
So with E 10 ( if im getting you ) our tunes are running a little more rich? I also dont pay enough attention to the differance between lambda and AFR based tunes because mine is lambda. So without thinking i assume everyones is....good to know.
I am not saying that with E10 your tune is running rich. (I do believe that if you were to find real gas though, it would be rich.) When it was "dialed in" via AT the resultant VEs were created based on the fuel that was being used at that time. Some on this forum go so far as to create different tunes via AT with different fuel octanes in anticipation of what may be available on their road trips.
I would keep your train of thought right where it is and not go nuts over this stuff. I do know that when I was my recent road trip to North Carolina, the gas was definitely better then the stuff we have here. My mileage and performance was a lot better. I definately notice stuff like that on a 1200 pound trike.
My bike runs fine, no pinging, good performance, not overly hot and fuel mileage is comparable to what others get with a trike. It's as close as anyone else could get it without a dyno (been there, done that with other bikes).
Sometimes I feel that this is a complicated subject and with my very limited understanding, I don't explain things quite right. Sure wish the brain trust would offer their insights.
You should be able to go into AT, fire the bike up and go into AT data collection and watch it count up hits. After it gets 50+ in idele area switch modes and look at the fron and rear change screens... I suspect you will see a large increase in VE in those cells. If so, export the map and go back into AT using the updated map.
Depending on "how close" your starting map is, the bike can run very rough untill you get a fun tuning runs in a particular area.
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders






