2017 Milwaukee Eight dyno testing & information

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Aug 25, 2016 | 08:33 PM

#21

2whlr4life

Seasoned HDF Member

Joined: Jan 2008

Posts: 5,914

Likes: 3,205

From: On one of 10,000

curious

& subscribed.

Aug 25, 2016 | 08:36 PM

#22

roadrash3

Road Master

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 842

Likes: 64

From: N. CA & East TN

Thanks Jamie, i look forward to both your expert review on this motor, and all the details you find. I love fuel moto and you are top notch, i am interested in selling my bike i just put my FM stuff on and starting over with this project next. Looks promising.

Aug 25, 2016 | 08:39 PM

#23

Goose_NC

Seasoned HDF Member

Joined: Feb 2016

Posts: 8,012

Likes: 6,908

From: NC

Should be interesting...

Aug 25, 2016 | 08:43 PM

#24

Thompson5

Cruiser

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 126

Likes: 0

Subscribed

Aug 25, 2016 | 08:44 PM

#25

Cowboy Rob

Big Kahuna HDF Member

Joined: Mar 2010

Posts: 32,562

Likes: 2,577

From: Shit Weather USA

In...

Aug 25, 2016 | 08:51 PM

#26

Gunnysgt

Grand HDF Member

Joined: Oct 2009

Posts: 3,824

Likes: 603

From: Myrtle Beach SC

Tuning will still be available from Harley but a modification of the Street tuner not the Pro super tuner. They are working on it now

Aug 25, 2016 | 09:02 PM

#27

R.Canales

Tourer

Joined: Mar 2015

Posts: 334

Likes: 12

From: Central Cal

Quote:

Originally Posted by jt metal

78/88 is my guess, untouched. Which I believe to be a touch on the high side.

I will go a little higher and say 87/96

Its hard to fathom 50% more intake and exhaust flow and better fuel economy all while producing more HP. The more Air introduced to a combustion engine needs more fuel to make more HP. I know that argument is not conducive to my guestimation of hp/tq numbers but im sure the engineers at MOCO are smarter than the average bear.