When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Maybe I'm wrong, but if it was only about performance we would all be riding something else. While we don't want to give up what we already have, it's about looks and sound. All of which is a personal preference. Now with that said, I believe I've read on here multiple times that a good tune will solve 90% of any performance problems. I suggest you buy what you like looks wise and sound wise. Then research who in your area will give you the best tune and have him do it. Now you have the looks you like, the sound you like and the best performance possible with your set up.
Maybe I'm wrong, but if it was only about performance we would all be riding something else. While we don't want to give up what we already have, it's about looks and sound.
Thank you for your input but you obviously don't know me well. Looks and sound are low on my priority list. Comfort and ridability are my priorities.
...I believe I've read on here multiple times that a good tune will solve 90% of any performance problems.
An exhaust system can make a difference in power delivery that no tuning can overcome. Drag pipes are a perfect example. If the change that true duals makes is minimal, then a good tune could certainly get back 70-90%. That's sort of what I'm trying to determine.
I hate to lose power in the 2000-3500 range as that is where we spend most of the time. Top end power is nice but on a touring bike how much time do we spend WFO?
You will lose some performance using True Duals in the rpm range you have described, not so much if you had a 113" or larger motor but in a relatively stock 96 you will. Your decision is, will the loss be worth the looks and sound of the TD's . Only you will be able to answer that, for me the answer is no, I run a 2-1.
I run Bub7 true duals and I can honestly say I felt a difference in low end power...enough to make me regret it?..no way. I will say this...my bike barks when you get on it...not too bad if you aren't hammering, but they will def hear you coming if you want them too...lol. Also, I hear some of the guys talking about the heat on the right side...I think I took care of most of that issue the day after i bought the bike with a stage one filter, SE slip ons, a power commander and a good dyno tune....BUT....I noticed when I went with the true duals, my left side is the side you want to look out for...lol...it gets hot right behind my calf!! Every now and then I see someone riding a bagger in shorts...all I think when I see this is "heh..try that on my bike". To each his own, but i would never go back...and while I did change my map around with a "canned map" after installing the true duals and now a heavy breather filter...I definately want to have it dynoed again when I can free up some money. There is such a difference of opinions on pipes...before I got mine i talked to and looked/listened to a lot of bikes on different rides to help me form a somewhat intelligent opinion..worked for em. Good luck Crim!
I believe in having a bike dyno tuned by a reputable facility and operator (with whatever tuner/intake/exhaust combo you use) as that identifies the flat spots in tq/hp. It helps validate or eliminate perceptions on what the changes to your bike have accomplished--or negated.
In my experience, it helped me see that I picked up torque/power as a result of going to true duals. That said, I don't have 2-1 to compare to, which was fine because I like the look of duals on what really isn't a performance bike.
I believe in having a bike dyno tuned by a reputable facility and operator (with whatever tuner/intake/exhaust combo you use) as that identifies the flat spots in tq/hp. It helps validate or eliminate perceptions on what the changes to your bike have accomplished--or negated.
In my experience, it helped me see that I picked up torque/power as a result of going to true duals. That said, I don't have 2-1 to compare to, which was fine because I like the look of duals on what really isn't a performance bike.
As you so rightly stated , no 2-1 to compare it to. I did the comparison and had a loss , no theory , real life!
As I've been finding out, the exhaust you run can make or break a bikes low end performance. I've just swapped out the original headers on my 2010 Street Glide for V&H Dresser Duals (still running the same RSD Tracker slip-ons)... now lets get one thing straight, I'm chasing performance on my 103" stage 4 and not looking to "bling" my bike up with a set of pipes. That said all the true duals did was make my bike run like a dog down low in the rpm's. After allot of banging my head on the wall and talking to guy's in the same position as me it has become apparent that you don't run true duals if your chasing performance as you NEED the across-over which my set doesn't, they are true duals.
Bumped into a guy on the weekend with the IDENTICAL bike/engine mods as me apart from the headers, which are 2-1-2, and he is getting more top end hp as well as a clean hard pulling bottom end. He said he was in my shoes when he was running true duals and since the change to 2-1-2 "it's a new bike"!! My next move is going with a 2-1-2.
2-1 would do the same thing I presume.
I also have a '07 softail running a 103" stage 2 running V&H True Duals and it it runs flawlessly. Off the lights it's identical to my friends 103" stage 2 in his 2010 Street Glide running factory headers (with cat in-tact) with slip-ons. So from what I've learnt, the higher the mod's are on your bike the more it matters you run a tuned set of pipes.
On a stock bike I don't think you wouldn't notice the difference. I do love the look and sound of the true duals though..
Last edited by TeeDee; Apr 18, 2010 at 09:28 PM.
Reason: more info
If performance is your holy grail, the RB Racing Black Hole 2-1 is what you are looking for. I lost 3 lb-ft across the board up to 3900, from there on up I gained 3 hp and tq was level until the 4800 drop off. Thats with Khrome Werks mufflers and dual head pipes vs the original head pipes. The Khrome Werks mufflers alone vs a cheaper competitor slid the tq left and added 9 from 2000-4000, a very worthy gain. But Im not really in a hurry, I was looking for a very specific sound without losing power. Any faster than 60 and my drink might vibrate out of its holder. Now Ive got my sound and a slight performance improvement to boot. Now if I was just better looking and rich...
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.