Please comment on my Dyno Sheet
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,800
Likes: 307
From: Houston, Texas
Please comment on my Dyno Sheet
I just got it back off the dyno and would like everyone's opinions.
I'm happy with it. It pulls hard and runs smoother. It's probably my imagination but the pipe seems a little quieter...which is nice. The 2 into 1 is louder than I expected compared to the true duals on my road king. Of course the cams and 103 make it louder anyway.
Thanks for your comments
2011 Ultra Classic
103 kit with 255 cams
Rinehart 2 into 1
I'm happy with it. It pulls hard and runs smoother. It's probably my imagination but the pipe seems a little quieter...which is nice. The 2 into 1 is louder than I expected compared to the true duals on my road king. Of course the cams and 103 make it louder anyway.
Thanks for your comments
2011 Ultra Classic
103 kit with 255 cams
Rinehart 2 into 1
Intermediate
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Why so wavy on the curves? Have a buddy that had his bike dynoed at a free event this past weekend and his looks the same. Dealer said something didn't look right but told him to have his installer check the program. Every dyno sheet I have had done (1998 wide glide, 2001 Road King, 2008 Nightster) The curves have been a lot smoother. Looks like it's making power and dropping a little and making power again? Let me know what you find out.
Cruiser
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 213
Likes: 12
From: Netherlands
I am sorry but I am not impressed. See attached my dyno sheet 07SG with rinehart slip ons and AN big sucker (= stage 1 only).
It's hard to read but hp=78 and torque=98ft-lbs at an constant A/F ratio of 13,2 (which is the optimum).
It's hard to read but hp=78 and torque=98ft-lbs at an constant A/F ratio of 13,2 (which is the optimum).
Last edited by lp77; Jun 25, 2011 at 01:37 PM.
Thread Starter
|
Road Warrior
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,800
Likes: 307
From: Houston, Texas
To give everyone a little more info, I asked that it be leaned out a tad at cruising speed for better mileage. It is a touring bike and will live most of it's life between 70 and 75MPH.
I didn't post this to brag on the numbers because as pointed out, they are subjective to the weather and million other variables. I am happy with the increase over the original factory download just from tuning. I thought the lines were slightly wavy but much smoother over the original.
I didn't post this to brag on the numbers because as pointed out, they are subjective to the weather and million other variables. I am happy with the increase over the original factory download just from tuning. I thought the lines were slightly wavy but much smoother over the original.
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 85
From: Nevada
Most have been high 80's, some very low 90's.
Stellar HDF Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 489
From: sunny florida
Your numbers are not bad 100 torque is a key number for baggers as they are heavy and 100 torque or better seems to get them moving , next where your torque hits , most of your riding will be between 2500 rpms and 3200 rpms , your torque looks good there however I personally would have like to seen a little more at 2500 , I run Cycle Rama CR-575 cams and I'm at 101 at 2500 but thats the difference in cams
Trending Topics
Grand HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,012
Likes: 298
From: Central Fl
HD Forum Stories
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Verdad Gallardo
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever
Pouria Savadkouei
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In
Verdad Gallardo
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Verdad Gallardo
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept
Verdad Gallardo
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Verdad Gallardo
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy
Joe Kucinski
