What's the purpose?
Or maybe your first three sentences were not about riding at all? This is a forum about riding so your audience will assume you are talking about riding. Your 4th sentance talks about the "soul of my bike when I ride", which (no matter how stupid sounding) reinforces that we are talking about riding. Again challenged with articulation?
2nd post you said something about beer bottles and jukeboxes. It was kinda out of nowhere. Not sure anybody knew what to do with the info since you didn't explain it. So we were supposed to assume you were now wondering about people wearing gloves while not riding? You could have actually posed the question about people wearing gloves while not riding to help us change gears and know you were completely changing course from the original thread question. It isn't till this last (3rd) post that you actually mention anything about not riding. Articulation.
Also in the 2nd post you say you are sticking to a theory about image that you never actually shared with us. If there is to be a theory discussed then you must ARTICULATE the theory. We have yet to hear anything about a theory other than that you are sticking to it.
Why don't I think you get it? Because in the second post you said you would "stick to my theory about image for most guys". If you are sticking to a theory then that means that nothing that has been said changed your mind. Which means there was no reason for 54 people to have posted. Which means you disagree with the opinions of 54 fellow riders and fellow forum members. Which means you don't get it. OR that NONE of us get it, which would be YOUR failure. Again, articulation.
At this point it seems that you have failed to articulate your thoughts from the very beginning of this thread straight to the end. Since you are not able to admit fault you have decided to accuse me of being challenged in comprehension and sarcasm.
If you want to know why guys wear gloves, in warm weather, while not riding, then I suggest you start such a thread, and ARTICULATE yourself in such a way that the audience knows you want to know about guys wearing gloves, in warm weather, while NOT RIDING.
So to conclude I have not failed to comprehend or detect sarcasm. Instead, YOU have failed to articulate. Look it up. You also owe all of us an apology for wasting our time and making us answer questions that you likely were never actually asking.
Or maybe your first three sentences were not about riding at all? This is a forum about riding so your audience will assume you are talking about riding. Your 4th sentance talks about the "soul of my bike when I ride", which (no matter how stupid sounding) reinforces that we are talking about riding. Again challenged with articulation?
2nd post you said something about beer bottles and jukeboxes. It was kinda out of nowhere. Not sure anybody knew what to do with the info since you didn't explain it. So we were supposed to assume you were now wondering about people wearing gloves while not riding? You could have actually posed the question about people wearing gloves while not riding to help us change gears and know you were completely changing course from the original thread question. It isn't till this last (3rd) post that you actually mention anything about not riding. Articulation.
Also in the 2nd post you say you are sticking to a theory about image that you never actually shared with us. If there is to be a theory discussed then you must ARTICULATE the theory. We have yet to hear anything about a theory other than that you are sticking to it.
Why don't I think you get it? Because in the second post you said you would "stick to my theory about image for most guys". If you are sticking to a theory then that means that nothing that has been said changed your mind. Which means there was no reason for 54 people to have posted. Which means you disagree with the opinions of 54 fellow riders and fellow forum members. Which means you don't get it. OR that NONE of us get it, which would be YOUR failure. Again, articulation.
At this point it seems that you have failed to articulate your thoughts from the very beginning of this thread straight to the end. Since you are not able to admit fault you have decided to accuse me of being challenged in comprehension and sarcasm.
If you want to know why guys wear gloves, in warm weather, while not riding, then I suggest you start such a thread, and ARTICULATE yourself in such a way that the audience knows you want to know about guys wearing gloves, in warm weather, while NOT RIDING.
So to conclude I have not failed to comprehend or detect sarcasm. Instead, YOU have failed to articulate. Look it up. You also owe all of us an apology for wasting our time and making us answer questions that you likely were never actually asking.
http://www.riverroadgear.com/Gloves/TucsonGlove.html
25 bucks for one year for the river road, or 55 bucks for 2 years on the hd.....
keep in mind, this is la, i wear the 'summer' gloves for 8 months out of the year....
http://www.revzilla.com/motorcycle/fox-bomber-gloves?utm_keyword=fox-bomber-gloves&utm_campaign=Gloves&utm_medium=base&utm_sou rce=Google&adtype=pla&kw={keyword}&gclid=CKqpguOy-7ACFUMCQAodr2pWEg
I have a pair of Gore Bike Wear windstoppers, with gel palms for cooler weather.
This..........
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders








