When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Oh boy, where to begin. No compliant, non adaptive headlight doesn't have a blind spot when leaning into a curve, period. It's a physically impossibility because compliant lights are required to have a cut-off zone, and when you lean into a corner you start to drive into that zone. If you ride like my Grandfather you may not notice it. If your light actually doesn't have this well defined cut-off then it's not a DOT compliant light. The most common reason for that is substitution of an aftermarket LED bulb in the original lens, resulting in the wrong light focus. (OEM H4 headlights tend to have pretty poor optics.) Same for those dumb "drop-in HIDs".
LOL..... what?
What you are saying is simply FALSE. You are just making up facts to bolster your opinion. Until the whole LED Daymaker came into being, these blind spots were virtually unheard of. No one ever disputed that LED lights don't make excellent light output, but until the Daymaker, going blind into corners was not a problem. Motorcycle manufactures have realized long before you or me were ever born........ that motorcycles LEAN. I mean, come on. The blind spot is a relatively new phenomenon. Even the MOCO has known about it since 2014 when the only motorcycles that came stock with the Daymakers, ALSO came with spot lights to fill in the gaps. The bikes like the Street Glide that had NO SPOTS...... were unavailable with the LED. They ONLY came with incandescent H9/H11 headlights. But I'm sure you think that's just a coincidence!!!
I agree.
If you read some of the other threads and experience on projector type LED headlights, often mentioned is that unless you are straight on to the bike, the light is not as bright as standard incandescent.
In other words slightly off to the side you are not as noticeable to traffic looking in their mirrors ...as well as not having such a good pattern to the sides for you to see the road.
Have a look at the JW video on their new "Comfort Lighting" and you will see what they were trying to address
And just for the record.....
This is the stock DOT compliant light pattern with an incandescent bulb.
And I NEVER had a problem leaning into a corner...
...You posted photos that actually show the reason for the problem. Seriously, I'm not trying to blow smoke up your rear. Look at it this way - even your photos show the DoT required vertical cut-off.
As an example - If you're going on a level road your low beam may light up the road to 100 feet. But if you suddenly come to a steep hill, your light can't light the hill until you actually start climbing it. In the transition from level to hill there's a section where you will override your lights because the cut-off will compress that 100 foot area to maybe 60 feet. Once you've transitioned onto the hill you'll be back to the 100 foot area. That's similar to what happens when you lean into a curve. The tighter the curve and more lean, the higher the compression of that lighted area. Taken to extreme, a 90 degree curve taken with the bike leaned over to almost 90 degrees would result in maybe 10 feet of lighted curve ahead of you - like trying to drive up your garage door! (Obviously a stupid idea.)
Addition of road lights will help, but unless they're aimed high enough to blind oncoming traffic they will suffer the same compression as the headlight as the lean angle and curve increases.
A good visual aid would be the best way to explain this, but I don't have one handy. Sorry.
...You posted photos that actually show the reason for the problem. Seriously, I'm not trying to blow smoke up your rear. Look at it this way - even your photos show the DoT required vertical cut-off.
As an example - If you're going on a level road your low beam may light up the road to 100 feet. But if you suddenly come to a steep hill, your light can't light the hill until you actually start climbing it. In the transition from level to hill there's a section where you will override your lights because the cut-off will compress that 100 foot area to maybe 60 feet. Once you've transitioned onto the hill you'll be back to the 100 foot area. That's similar to what happens when you lean into a curve. The tighter the curve and more lean, the higher the compression of that lighted area. Taken to extreme, a 90 degree curve taken with the bike leaned over to almost 90 degrees would result in maybe 10 feet of lighted curve ahead of you - like trying to drive up your garage door! (Obviously a stupid idea.)
Addition of road lights will help, but unless they're aimed high enough to blind oncoming traffic they will suffer the same compression as the headlight as the lean angle and curve increases.
A good visual aid would be the best way to explain this, but I don't have one handy. Sorry.
Your argument is absolutely valid. But what your not appreciating is that the standard Halogen lens and housing casts a much broader pattern on the road than does the extremely precise light pattern of the original Daymakers. So yes, even though the incandescent housing does have its limitations, its still better at casting a more diffused pattern of the road, which become advantages during sharp leaning turns. And where the complaints from Daymaker owners stem from. I WAS running a 80/100 watt Hella in my stock housing. I'll tell you this, when you were on the back roads and threw that sucker on high beam, it freaking lit up the world. I have NEVER found any LED that could compete with that 100 watt Hella at night and on back roads. And the reason it was so awesome was it broadly painted everything in front of the bike. It threw precise defined light patterns right out the window, and just blew light everywhere. Even my current OPT7 drop in LED can not outdo that 100w Hella on pitch black back roads. But, alas, it wasn't even close to DOT compliant, so I switched to my current LED. I run a Daymaker style composite light on my Snorkster. Its a great light, but I ride that bike a whole lot less so any further attempts at light output improvement are unnecessary for me.
Your argument is absolutely valid. But what your not appreciating is that the standard Halogen lens and housing casts a much broader pattern on the road than does the extremely precise light pattern of the original Daymakers. So yes, even though the incandescent housing does have its limitations, its still better at casting a more diffused pattern of the road, which become advantages during sharp leaning turns.
I agree - the limitations of the oem h4 lenses in this case is an advantage in turns.
And where the complaints from Daymaker owners stem from. I WAS running a 80/100 watt Hella in my stock housing. I'll tell you this, when you were on the back roads and threw that sucker on high beam, it freaking lit up the world. I have NEVER found any LED that could compete with that 100 watt Hella at night and on back roads. And the reason it was so awesome was it broadly painted everything in front of the bike. It threw precise defined light patterns right out the window, and just blew light everywhere. Even my current OPT7 drop in LED can not outdo that 100w Hella on pitch black back roads. But, alas, it wasn't even close to DOT compliant, so I switched to my current LED. I run a Daymaker style composite light on my Snorkster. Its a great light, but I ride that bike a whole lot less so any further attempts at light output improvement are unnecessary for me.
While I've never run a Hella on my bike, all my vehicles since the 70's have run Hella lights. I'd rate Hella#2 for optics quality (Cibié #1).
Here's a few screen captures from a video I did after I mounted the Adaptive light. I had it pointed a bit low on this first ride, but you can see the extra bars of fill-in light in the turns (I tend to lean my BO over quite a bit even at slow speed.)
I tend to lean my BO over quite a bit even at slow speed.)
Really? that kind of ever so slightly goes against the physics of the situation ...speed and the angle/sweep of the corner, and the design of the bike (front/rear tyres etc) kind of dictate how much lean is required. Most riders don't tend to think, oh I think I will scrape my pegs here just for the hell of it??
Anyway, getting back to halogen lights have been fine for donkey's years ...and I am not disagreeing in the slightest that more light in a corner is not a good thing ...have you worked out that with a DOT pattern cut off 2ş below horizontal and you lean the bike 30ş ...with a light that has good peripheral spread (no, that is not blinding oncoming traffic) ...there is still more than plenty light in the corner ...and always has been until LED headlights came out with rather rubbish peripheral spread.
OK, unless you lean 30ş and turn the handlebars into the turn ...but we would fall off then
Good lights bad lights whatever, best advice is to see one in real life and decide if it is for you or not (that decision normally includes the cost of the unit, obviously)
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.