When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel InjectionNeed advice on ignition issues? Questions about a tuner? Have questions about a EFI calibration or Fuel Injection? Tips on Engine Diagnostics, how to get codes, and what they mean. Find your answers here.
I don't believe I will do a lot of tuning with the unit but like the convenience of how it connects and what it can do in the future
My bike so far I put slip ons at 3000km, then xieds at 6000kms, then air intake at 13500kms, running fine, do a lot of freeway, country roads cruising,
Now at 24000kms I just put full V&h straight shots on, I will try and locate a "seller/tuner" here in Aus that can preload map otherwise I check out Dynojet direct
Mirrmu... it is always better to have a starter cal that is good and close to any modifications you have made. Doesnt matter if you are using basic auto tune or wide band auto tune a starter map will just make the tuning process faster. You dont even need a starter map if you cant get one but dyno jet will provide one for you if needed. With the powervision if you cant get a starter map from anyone you can either use one that is close to what you have ( say you have reinhart exaust but no starter cal for them you can use one for vance n hines ) or you could use the stock map that is loaded in your ECM already and it will adjust as you run some tuning runs.
Not the best advice to give someone not knowing the build. It wouldn't take long, as in minutes, to damage an engine trying to tune with the wrong starter cal.
I don't believe I will do a lot of tuning with the unit but like the convenience of how it connects and what it can do in the future
My bike so far I put slip ons at 3000km, then xieds at 6000kms, then air intake at 13500kms, running fine, do a lot of freeway, country roads cruising,
Now at 24000kms I just put full V&h straight shots on, I will try and locate a "seller/tuner" here in Aus that can preload map otherwise I check out Dynojet direct
Thanks
Mirrmu
True, having a tuner to use in the future is a big plus. Another nice thing about the PV is you can leave it mounted and use it as a tool to monitor your engine. Engine temp, tach, gear, battery voltage, etc. There are numerous engine vitals that you can monitor easily. I find that a big plus with the PV. Another plus to having a tuning device is you can do quick checks of the tune. As time goes by, and miles stack up, systems efficiencies change. Having a tool such as the PV lets you run a quick "refresh" tune once a year, if you like to tinker around. What sold me on the PV was the ability to monitor things AFTER I finish a tune. To spend 500+ bucks to tune, and then throw the PV on the workbench, would have been a waste of money. But, to be able to tune a bike AND then use it as a way to monitor the engine, was a big hit. Anyway, read up and see what you think. Even if you didn't tune it's probably worth the cash just to have it as a tool to monitor things.
Hi all
I'm reasonably satisfied with my tune so far. I keep my PV mounted on the bars monitoring CHT,MPG,etc.. On longer rides I'll log data to see if there's any Knock.I have very few small random events 0.5-2 deg.So since Im finally settled on my spark tables, I thought I'd run AT one more time and check my VE's against the latest spark tables.OK, heres the thing that still bamboozles me, The VE's were good 1-2% and a couple3%s,Thats all good, BUT the log I created while ATing showed Knock Events from 0.5 all the way to 8 deg.It may be even higher but thats the limit set.Not just a few but more than 1,500 out of about 15K lines of data!Thats over 10% of that ride. Ive seen this and posted about it before and couldn't understand how this could be,When AT retards 4 deg. from the start.Has anyone else compared AT logs to regular data logs and seen the same results?Could it be the leaner AFR AT runs? I'm not going to pull any more spark because with that last AT run I could feel that extra 4deg starting to get kinda sluggish, or flat through the power band.
Hi all
I'm reasonably satisfied with my tune so far. I keep my PV mounted on the bars monitoring CHT,MPG,etc.. On longer rides I'll log data to see if there's any Knock.I have very few small random events 0.5-2 deg.So since Im finally settled on my spark tables, I thought I'd run AT one more time and check my VE's against the latest spark tables.OK, heres the thing that still bamboozles me, The VE's were good 1-2% and a couple3%s,Thats all good, BUT the log I created while ATing showed Knock Events from 0.5 all the way to 8 deg.It may be even higher but thats the limit set.Not just a few but more than 1,500 out of about 15K lines of data!Thats over 10% of that ride. Ive seen this and posted about it before and couldn't understand how this could be,When AT retards 4 deg. from the start.Has anyone else compared AT logs to regular data logs and seen the same results?Could it be the leaner AFR AT runs? I'm not going to pull any more spark because with that last AT run I could feel that extra 4deg starting to get kinda sluggish, or flat through the power band.
tired of chasing my tail
Smokey....was it you that emailed some logs to jamie and he looked them over about this last time? if it was what was the outcome?
The powervision is starting to make me wonder again about bugs. i would say if you are not getting any ping your probably ok. Your log with the small anout of spark retard is probably more accurate that the log with 1500 events. I cant begin to list the problems that i think the powervision has.Everytime i talk with dynojet it seems like they wont give you a straight answer to some questions.I also noticed there is another firmware update. i have not downloaded it because there is no read me file to say what the update has fixed or changed. if your happy with the way your bike is running ride and enjoy. dont sweat the small stuff.
Yes, I posted my experiences with AT logs Vs Data logs in this thread and my reply from Jamie at FM. posts# 4636,4642,4654,4749. Cover most of it.I should of just export,flashed,the small VE changes. I had let it go as just a quirk of ATing and the settings it changes,Plus while in AT mode I'm usually pushing it well beyond my normal riding habits. Winding it up to 5500-6000 rpm in as many gears as traffic and road conditions permit. and lugging through the gears as well.trying to fill the entire green page with red cells.But I logged and peeked,(ocd) lol. So I believe the data logs are the ones I should work with. Never tried the max spark learn 10 ,VE-0 tip at the end of the manual. who knows wth I'd end up with lol.Was just wondering if anyone else compared Logs and had similar results.
Smokey....was it you that emailed some logs to jamie and he looked them over about this last time? if it was what was the outcome?
The powervision is starting to make me wonder again about bugs. i would say if you are not getting any ping your probably ok. Your log with the small anout of spark retard is probably more accurate that the log with 1500 events. I cant begin to list the problems that i think the powervision has.Everytime i talk with dynojet it seems like they wont give you a straight answer to some questions.I also noticed there is another firmware update. i have not downloaded it because there is no read me file to say what the update has fixed or changed. if your happy with the way your bike is running ride and enjoy. dont sweat the small stuff.
Please do elaborate on your statement about PV problems and not getting straight answers. I use a PV and would be very interested. If nothing else, just to know what to be on the lookout for. Thanks...Nate
Smokey....was it you that emailed some logs to jamie and he looked them over about this last time? if it was what was the outcome?
The powervision is starting to make me wonder again about bugs. i would say if you are not getting any ping your probably ok. Your log with the small anout of spark retard is probably more accurate that the log with 1500 events. I cant begin to list the problems that i think the powervision has.Everytime i talk with dynojet it seems like they wont give you a straight answer to some questions.I also noticed there is another firmware update. i have not downloaded it because there is no read me file to say what the update has fixed or changed. if your happy with the way your bike is running ride and enjoy. dont sweat the small stuff.
I'm curious to see your list of problems with the PV. If you would, please list each and every problem or bug and why you are convinced these are problems. WHY, in technical terms, you think these problem areas are holding someone back from getting a solid tune is the important info I'd like to hear about.
Last edited by stailjim61; Jul 28, 2013 at 01:23 PM.
Yes, I posted my experiences with AT logs Vs Data logs in this thread and my reply from Jamie at FM. posts# 4636,4642,4654,4749. Cover most of it.I should of just export,flashed,the small VE changes. I had let it go as just a quirk of ATing and the settings it changes,Plus while in AT mode I'm usually pushing it well beyond my normal riding habits. Winding it up to 5500-6000 rpm in as many gears as traffic and road conditions permit. and lugging through the gears as well.trying to fill the entire green page with red cells.But I logged and peeked,(ocd) lol. So I believe the data logs are the ones I should work with. Never tried the max spark learn 10 ,VE-0 tip at the end of the manual. who knows wth I'd end up with lol.Was just wondering if anyone else compared Logs and had similar results.
The only thing I can think of would be the timing slightly altering the VE's during an AT run. I was never a big fan of the PV pulling 4 degrees for an AT run, and then putting it back afterwards. I know timing will change the VE's slightly but how much I really couldn't say. Perhaps the answer may be to run AT's until the VE's are good, or at least close. Then get your timing squared away. Then once timing is good to go make a few finishing VE runs with Log Tuner, NOT AT. This way you'd be finalizing the VE's WITHOUT the 4 degrees being pulled. This is why I prefer to let Log Tuner do the actual calibration. Either way, I agree that the data logs (with a final tune, not during AT) would be the numbers to look at. There shouldn't be any fudging of the numbers doing a true data log and it should be telling you current state of the tune as you're running it.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.