Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel Injection Need advice on ignition issues? Questions about a tuner? Have questions about a EFI calibration or Fuel Injection? Tips on Engine Diagnostics, how to get codes, and what they mean. Find your answers here.

Power Vision Information Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2013 | 04:50 PM
  #5441  
stailjim61's Avatar
stailjim61
Road Captain
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by uwiik
Bought my PV yesterday after three weeks messing around with my SEPST to the point of insanity. Couldn't even describe the feeling I have right now, very happy and mad at the same time, I feel like frying my SEPST and feed it to my nosy neighbour if I could...The 'Stupid tune' feature was hopeless and data record function is blind to knock event in SEPST, it would log 0 retard when I hear very audible pinging.. I had to rely on my AEM AFR sniffer to set my VE tables.

I thought I had my SEPST tune pretty close and the AFR reading after my 3 weeks of madness was OK with a fair bit of inconsistency, blamed it on my exhaust sniffer, turned out I was DEAD wrong!! After ONE 20 min Power Vision Autotune Basic session (No PC) now my AFR meter woud read perfect target AFR to the dots on steady throttle!! I realized that my AFR meter with the DIY sniffer was working perfectly and super accurate, it was the SEPST that has been giving me the inconsistent result. Now after Power Vision the bike feel soooo much smoother, sounds so much smoother and the pipe has a nice deep smooth throathy rumble on it I never hear before... Perfect...I will do a few more Autotune Basic to perfect the VE tables and will create multiple tunes for different conditions from there...

Now the big question....

I noticed from the gauges that I am having knock retard event, I would like to tune that out. I am familiar about how to read maps and how to work on timing advance/retard for maximum efficiency Without a dyno to tell you what's happening we'll never know where that perfect pressure point is for efficiency. Seat of the pants, smoothness, and lack of pinging is about the best we can expect from a garage tune. and to elliminate knocking but I am confused as which tuning/logging/calculation method to use, Autotune Basic or Log Tuner?? Some people says that after I perfect the VE tables, I can activate spark learning on Autotune Basic by switching 'Max Spark Learn' to 10 on setting and ignore further VE correction by turning 'Max VE Learn' to 0 then run Autotune basic session as normal but focusing on spark event only and tune from there. However, Dynojet instruction advises against this on Autotune basic?? The ultimate end result is where the ECM has to do as little as possible. The less it has to learn and store means the less calculating it has to do = smoother more reliable tune. If you're dealing with timing and knock events the last thing I would do is ignore any VE corrections. If it's a lean knock, fix it. If it's a high temp knock, fix it. If it's an over advanced knock, fix it. Yes, the system would probably take care of it, but I'm not a big fan of ignoring issues and over-taxing the ECM to sort it out.

I know Log Tuner is what everyone use, but I am not comfortable with it yet and I like the fact that Autotune basic can be setup and done without the use of PC at all and I am already comfortable with its simplicity with automatic set to CL table, automatic off to AE/DE/PE/EITMS vs. having to do it manually on Log Tuner....If I can use Spark Learning on Autotune Basic, I don't think I will ever use Log Tuner.

Advises are so much appreciated and thank you very much in advance!
Log Tuner takes less than 5 minutes to use. If used to dial in your timing you won't have to rely on the tune to learn anything with timing. I think jacking up the learning parameters and forcing the ECM to deal with knock events is heading in the wrong direction. From a performance standpoint, every time the ECM picks up an event and retards timing, you're losing performance. You might feel it, you might not. It may pick up a knock that was caused by being advanced .10 degree and pull 2 degrees. But, if you dial in your table to not throw that knock event you won't lose 2 degrees, thus a more steady performance level. Why not just set it up to not retard from the get go? Get your timing as close as you can under normal riding scenarios and leave the adaptive learning for times when you catch a ping from bad gas.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2013 | 04:57 PM
  #5442  
stailjim61's Avatar
stailjim61
Road Captain
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Megalog Viewer

Is anyone using this software? I have been reading a little about it. Just curious if it's something that could be used to analyze a tune after the last VE runs are accomplished. I searched for a forum to follow but couldn't find anything specific to Harley's, just bits and pieces.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2013 | 05:14 PM
  #5443  
Uncle Chester's Avatar
Uncle Chester
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,392
Likes: 184
From: Big ol Titties
Default

Originally Posted by stailjim61
Is anyone using this software? I have been reading a little about it. Just curious if it's something that could be used to analyze a tune after the last VE runs are accomplished. I searched for a forum to follow but couldn't find anything specific to Harley's, just bits and pieces.

I know it's really poular over on XLforum.com, I've analyzed a couple of logs with the trial version you can download. Not sure if it is just the fact that I only want to focus on one thing at a time or that I am just not that proficient at using Mega Log view but it just seemed like another way of looking at the same data we already have. I keep meaning to play with it some more but just never get around to it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2013 | 05:41 PM
  #5444  
Ratbob's Avatar
Ratbob
Road Master
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 894
Likes: 4
From: Newberg OR
Default

MegaLogViewerHD is way slick, well worth the ~$25 asking price! There are many interesting combinations of ECM variables that are easily displayed (it's been a while since I've run it so I don't have any specific examples). Earlier in this thread someone showed how to use the scatter plot feature to show how your tune converges as you step through multiple tuning iterations. Just make sure to download the HD version.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2013 | 08:01 PM
  #5445  
uwiik's Avatar
uwiik
Road Captain
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 528
Likes: 44
From: Jakarta - Indonesia
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Chester
I prefer logtuner to make timing changes after I have my VE's dialed in. Mostly this is due to AT changing to many parameters for me to trust the timing changes it makes. When I'm out riding my AFR table is not set to 14.6 across the board and my timing is not retarded 4 degrees to start with. My actual map may or may not have the same knock events as the ones I mIght see in AT mode. In order to use log tuner for timing changes you don't need to turn off AE/DE/PE/EITMS or anything else. Just go out and ride, I will do some roll ons and find a few hills in order to really load the engine and hit the higher MAP areas as that is when it is most likely to ping. The only time you need to turn off the AE/DE/PE/EITMS is if you are doing your whole tune on log tuner and you are calibrating your VE's. Also if you only have a couple areas of the map seeing knock events you can just view your log in excel and make manual changes as needed.
Oh, didn't know about that. So if I am only targetting specific ping on log tuner and not working with VE I do not need to touch AE/DE/PE/EITMS? Do I need to set AFR to Closed Loop with 4* timing retard or I can just leave it as I set it?

I am running open loop 100% on city riding due to the fact that I always ride on 100F+ with a lot of stop and go traffic, planning to build second map with cruise area on closed loop for out of town riding.

Thank you for the advises...
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2013 | 08:18 PM
  #5446  
uwiik's Avatar
uwiik
Road Captain
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 528
Likes: 44
From: Jakarta - Indonesia
Default

Originally Posted by stailjim61
Log Tuner takes less than 5 minutes to use. If used to dial in your timing you won't have to rely on the tune to learn anything with timing. I think jacking up the learning parameters and forcing the ECM to deal with knock events is heading in the wrong direction. From a performance standpoint, every time the ECM picks up an event and retards timing, you're losing performance. You might feel it, you might not. It may pick up a knock that was caused by being advanced .10 degree and pull 2 degrees. But, if you dial in your table to not throw that knock event you won't lose 2 degrees, thus a more steady performance level. Why not just set it up to not retard from the get go? Get your timing as close as you can under normal riding scenarios and leave the adaptive learning for times when you catch a ping from bad gas.
That is exactly what I am planning to do, not loading up the ECM with auto correction this and that with proper tune to begin with and I am planning to do it in steps. My AFR sniffer has confirmed my set target AFR is now very very close to spot on, I am going to do 4-5 more VE tune until only seeing 1-2% VE correction between runs, then target my Knock retard event and not touch the VE table further.

The reason I am not going to touch VE when tuning Knock event is because the dynojet instruction specifically says so and I am running 100% open loop right now at 12.8-13.2, so if there is any knock event when I am running rich at 13.2 chances are it is either heat knock being in 100F+ environment or over advance knock.

I ride in 100F+ with stop and go traffic on most of my ride, so closed loop is a futile effort in my case, planning to tackle this situation first on open loop then create another map with closed loop in cruise for riding out of town with no traffic and more chances of getting bad gas.
 

Last edited by uwiik; Sep 25, 2013 at 08:22 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2013 | 08:34 PM
  #5447  
Uncle Chester's Avatar
Uncle Chester
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,392
Likes: 184
From: Big ol Titties
Default

Originally Posted by uwiik
Oh, didn't know about that. So if I am only targetting specific ping on log tuner and not working with VE I do not need to touch AE/DE/PE/EITMS? Do I need to set AFR to Closed Loop with 4* timing retard or I can just leave it as I set it?

I am running open loop 100% on city riding due to the fact that I always ride on 100F+ with a lot of stop and go traffic, planning to build second map with cruise area on closed loop for out of town riding.

Thank you for the advises...
No need to go closed loop or retard timing 4 degrees, just log a normal ride, maybe get after it a little more than normal in order to hit as many high load areas of your map as you can. That way when you are tuning any knock events out you are tuning them out under actual riding conditions on your actual tune. If you go into closed loop or retard your timing, then you may induce knock in areas that your actual tune is fine running in. Same goes for retarding the timing, it may hide areas that you would see knock events in your regular tune.

I understand what you are talking about as far as running a open loop as well. I see pretty similar temps where I am located, highest them I road in this summer was just shy of 120 degrees. I leave my cruise range set at 14.2 and that is as lean as I go. I see some pretty extreme temp swings as well winter time I will see temps in the 15 degree range. I actually set up two separate tunes last year when my motor was 96" and will do the same this year with my 107". That way i will have a winter tune and a summer tune. Might not be necessary but I enjoy the tuning process and it gives me a excuse to go out and ride.
 
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2013 | 10:50 PM
  #5448  
uwiik's Avatar
uwiik
Road Captain
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 528
Likes: 44
From: Jakarta - Indonesia
Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Chester
No need to go closed loop or retard timing 4 degrees, just log a normal ride, maybe get after it a little more than normal in order to hit as many high load areas of your map as you can. That way when you are tuning any knock events out you are tuning them out under actual riding conditions on your actual tune. If you go into closed loop or retard your timing, then you may induce knock in areas that your actual tune is fine running in. Same goes for retarding the timing, it may hide areas that you would see knock events in your regular tune.

I understand what you are talking about as far as running a open loop as well. I see pretty similar temps where I am located, highest them I road in this summer was just shy of 120 degrees. I leave my cruise range set at 14.2 and that is as lean as I go. I see some pretty extreme temp swings as well winter time I will see temps in the 15 degree range. I actually set up two separate tunes last year when my motor was 96" and will do the same this year with my 107". That way i will have a winter tune and a summer tune. Might not be necessary but I enjoy the tuning process and it gives me a excuse to go out and ride.
Hahaha, I know what are you talking about, I don't know about you but I actually prefer to ride in 100+ temp rather than 32- temp, did a fair bit of cold weather riding during my younger age when I was living in Australia, the extreme cold is much more tormenting than extreme heat when riding motorcycle in my opinion, off course 70-80 would be perfect but we can't have it all can't we?

So here are my conclusion, please correct me if I am wrong.

- I am comfortable with simple Autotune, and I think for VE tuning only it is still pretty accurate judging from my AFR sniffer reading, so I can stick with this method to perfect my VE before moving to Log Tuner to tune my Spark Knock.
- When it is time to play around with my timing, I will then move to Log Tuner. However, since I will be tuning Spark Knock ONLY, I do not need to retard 4* of timing, no need full CL table, no need to 0 DE/AE/PE/EITMS. Just ride it with ALL setting as I would normally ride while logging and calculate ONLY the Spark Knock table after I am done logging?
- If that's the case, then on PV's Datalog/Assign Signals setting I DO NOT need to include VE NEW F&R and DOES include the rest of the logging parameters (MAP, TP, ET, AE, ES, Desired Lambda/AFR, Warmup Lambda/AFR, Spark Knock Retards F&R) and subsequently do so when exporting to Log Tuner software and do the calculation?
- Kinda got a hint of the answer of the above questions from your reply and posts on page 543, but I wasn't 100% sure and need to have a firm confirmation for my analytical thinking. Sorry if I am repeating the questions.

Thank you very much for the helpful advises, so much appreciated!!...
 

Last edited by uwiik; Sep 25, 2013 at 11:36 PM.
Reply
HD Forum Stories

The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders

story-0

7 Times Harley-Davidson Chucked Tradition Out the Window

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Sep 26, 2013 | 10:27 PM
  #5449  
stailjim61's Avatar
stailjim61
Road Captain
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by uwiik
Hahaha, I know what are you talking about, I don't know about you but I actually prefer to ride in 100+ temp rather than 32- temp, did a fair bit of cold weather riding during my younger age when I was living in Australia, the extreme cold is much more tormenting than extreme heat when riding motorcycle in my opinion, off course 70-80 would be perfect but we can't have it all can't we?

So here are my conclusion, please correct me if I am wrong.

- I am comfortable with simple Autotune, and I think for VE tuning only it is still pretty accurate judging from my AFR sniffer reading, so I can stick with this method to perfect my VE before moving to Log Tuner to tune my Spark Knock.
- When it is time to play around with my timing, I will then move to Log Tuner. However, since I will be tuning Spark Knock ONLY, I do not need to retard 4* of timing, no need full CL table, no need to 0 DE/AE/PE/EITMS. Just ride it with ALL setting as I would normally ride while logging and calculate ONLY the Spark Knock table after I am done logging?

You need to log the 11 channels that regard to the cal your running. I would still see what the VE's look like, even if you don't recalibrate them. If they're solid no problem. You collected data, might as well look at them. If, for no other reason, you can see where a knock event happened, and then look at the VE. I always look at the VE's to see if there's a correlation to a low VE and a knock event. Map cal easier to interpret than a TP cal.

- If that's the case, then on PV's Datalog/Assign Signals setting I DO NOT need to include VE NEW F&R and DOES include the rest of the logging parameters (MAP, TP, ET, AE, ES, Desired Lambda/AFR, Warmup Lambda/AFR, Spark Knock Retards F&R) and subsequently do so when exporting to Log Tuner software and do the calculation?

Again, log the respective channels that pertain to your tune. AFR or Lambda. There are 11 if I recall correctly. If you're only working timing then just pull the tick marks out of VE fr and rr when the box pops up. This has all been covered in previous threads.

- Kinda got a hint of the answer of the above questions from your reply and posts on page 543, but I wasn't 100% sure and need to have a firm confirmation for my analytical thinking. Sorry if I am repeating the
questions.

Don't overcomplicate this. Follow the instructions. Log the appropriate channels. Create a .ppv. Let LT do the rest. Rinse and repeat until you don't pick up any knock hits. Using LT you should be able to get it right in 3 or 4 runs. Then tweak for annoying vibrations in any riding areas. Search the thread, there are tons of instructions on how to attack it.

Thank you very much for the helpful advises, so much appreciated!!...
The search function will get you through this.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 02:05 AM
  #5450  
uwiik's Avatar
uwiik
Road Captain
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 528
Likes: 44
From: Jakarta - Indonesia
Default

Originally Posted by stailjim61
The search function will get you through this.
Thanks for the advices, much appreciated.

I have read the entire thread starting from page 250 something when they started to discuss AT or LT, pages before that are not relevant anymore discussing the earlier firmware. I have done my homework before decided to add more to this thread. Nice way to eat through time during boring office hour Maybe I am just plain dumb or the thread applies to the older firmware not latest one, but I still have my confusion.

Autotuned 4 more runs last night and it's getting closer and closer. VE corrections dropped from 15% to 11% on 4th run and my AFR sniffer got even more consistent reading.


One last thing I will add to this lengthy thread, this might be useful for the other too.

-I have all the latest software and firmware (updated everything 3 days ago), I found out that I do not need to manually assign 11 channels to do tuner log. The auto tune screen will do everything automatically perfectly and I can import all the correct logging data with all the parameters to Log Tuner software fine.

-I still need to manually set lambda to 1 on working Lambda table, found out if I let AT screen to do it for me automatically I will get a lot of NBF:0 or NBR:0 during green tracer cell/log tuning screen.

- No need to manually enter 319245 code anymore to go to green tracer cell/log tuning screen, it can be done with the push of a button on AT screen

- There is no difference in capability or logging parameters between Autotune basic vs. Log Tuner. However, on Auto tune basic you just blindly accept the correction suggested by the data collected and flash it to your current tune without reviewing what it changes vs. Log Tuner you get to review the suggested change and apply it manually with the obvious option to apply what you want to apply only.

- Basically in my opinion the manuals that has been around making it seems like Power Vision run Autotune Basic and PC run Log Tuner are two different things with common goal. On the other hand, my experiments shows that with the latest firmware both are doing exactly the same thing, the only difference is on how it apply the correction to the map (Directly on PV vs via PC).

Correct me if I am wrong, like I said I might be just plain dumb. In the meantime I will try not to add even more pages to this already super long thread.
 

Last edited by uwiik; Sep 27, 2013 at 02:28 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 PM.

story-0
7 Times Harley-Davidson Chucked Tradition Out the Window

Slideshow: Harley-Davidson built its reputation on nostalgia, but every so often, the company took a hard left turn into the future.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-20 11:18:19


VIEW MORE
story-1
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles

Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 16:50:35


VIEW MORE
story-2
8 Best Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever

Slideshow: Not every Harley gets it right, but these are the ones that genuinely earned their reputation.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-15 14:23:21


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Worst Harley-Davidson Motorcycles Ever

Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-01 20:01:09


VIEW MORE
story-4
Killer Custom's Jail Break Is The Breakout That Refused to Blend In

Slideshow: Killer Custom's "Jail Breaker" build focuses more on stance and visual aggression than mechanical overhaul.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-18 19:20:32


VIEW MORE
story-5
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?

Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-07 16:15:30


VIEW MORE
story-6
Harley-Davidson Reveals Super Cool Cafe Racer Concept

Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's new RMCR concept revives the café racer formula with modern hardware-and it may be exactly the reset the company needs.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-04 12:23:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II

Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-02-24 18:19:44


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Motorcycles You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There is no shortage of great motorcycles to buy, but we would avoid these ten.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-02-19 14:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Things Harley-Davidson Needs to Fix in 2026

Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-13 18:33:17


VIEW MORE