When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel InjectionNeed advice on ignition issues? Questions about a tuner? Have questions about a EFI calibration or Fuel Injection? Tips on Engine Diagnostics, how to get codes, and what they mean. Find your answers here.
No leak, but the rear exhaust path out is significantly shorter than the front now. I might try a more restrictive baffle in that muffler to help balance the cylinders, if you think that is worth the effort.
A quick test if you are using the Auto Tune Pro kit would be to go to Datalog>Gauges and configure 2 gauges with Front & Rear AFR, start the bike and get yourself a get yourself a piece of 2X4 (OK, dont laugh) and while watching the AFR live on the PV screen block the end of the muffler with the block of wood, then remove it and go back and forth a bit. If there is reversion getting back up to the sensor the AFR will be all over the place and will read leaner than the actual mixture. Last week I tuned a bike on the dyno with V&H Dresser Duals & mufflers with big straight thru cores and the AFR reported by the wideband on the rear cylinder was way lean due to the amount of reversion in the pipe. Also looking at your rear VE table I can see it is significantly richer than any of our true duals maps.
Jamie.. got any experience tuning CFR mufflers in a 2-1-2 setup? These are the newer style which according to at least 1 reputable tuner CFR seems to have corrected the back pressure issue to some extent and they are tuning fairly well.
A quick test if you are using the Auto Tune Pro kit would be to go to Datalog>Gauges and configure 2 gauges with Front & Rear AFR, start the bike and get yourself a get yourself a piece of 2X4 (OK, dont laugh) and while watching the AFR live on the PV screen block the end of the muffler with the block of wood, then remove it and go back and forth a bit. If there is reversion getting back up to the sensor the AFR will be all over the place and will read leaner than the actual mixture. Last week I tuned a bike on the dyno with V&H Dresser Duals & mufflers with big straight thru cores and the AFR reported by the wideband on the rear cylinder was way lean due to the amount of reversion in the pipe. Also looking at your rear VE table I can see it is significantly richer than any of our true duals maps.
Went and tried this out. I have AFR1 and AFR2 in the advanced signals from the PV. AFR2 doesn't seem to move much, in fact only .1-.2 most of the time. AFR1 (which I've always used for monitoring) changes with warm up, acceleration/deceleration, etc. Are these supposed to represent front (1) and rear (2) AFR? I've got several sets of baffles so I'm running experiments to try and find the optimal solution. Right now a 2" in the rear cylinder (right muffler) and a 2.25" in the other seems to be the right direction. I won't know for sure until I get an AT session or two done.
I know this question is a little off the current topic so forgive me. But I was wondering if the ECM has any ability to adjust for altitude changes in the OPEN loop areas of the AFR table. I'm assuming not, since the only pressure sensor it has is the MAP, and if the MAP read a lower pressure(because of higher altitude) it would simply go to the corresponding cell of the table, though not necessarily lean out the mixture across the board like you would want in the thinner air. I would also assume that redoing the autotune at the new altitude would change the VE tables and solve the problem?
On another note...does anyone know how long the stock narrowband O2 sensors can be expected to be accurate before needing replacement? I remember being told a long time ago that O2 sensors are really only accurate for a few years or so.
I know this question is a little off the current topic so forgive me. But I was wondering if the ECM has any ability to adjust for altitude changes in the OPEN loop areas of the AFR table.
ECM has no idea about fuel changes and AFR settings in open loop regardless of whether you're at 10ft or 13,000ft so therefore it will not be able compensate properly for those changes in altitude either.
Originally Posted by Red Dragons
I'm assuming not, since the only pressure sensor it has is the MAP, and if the MAP read a lower pressure(because of higher altitude) it would simply go to the corresponding cell of the table, though not necessarily lean out the mixture across the board like you would want in the thinner air.
you assume correctly.
Originally Posted by Red Dragons
I would also assume that redoing the autotune at the new altitude would change the VE tables and solve the problem?
not sure I'm following you here. Unless you're auto-tuning (which in itself is another topic altogether) with wideband sensors then you're only adjusting the VEs in the closed loop areas of which the ECM is capable of correcting on it's own at differing altitudes.
Originally Posted by Red Dragons
On another note...does anyone know how long the stock narrowband O2 sensors can be expected to be accurate before needing replacement? I remember being told a long time ago that O2 sensors are really only accurate for a few years or so.
Thanks.
there really is no "lifespan" for an o2 sensor per say as I understand it. When testing results dictate that it is no longer functioning according to EPA standards then according to EPA, they need to be replaced. This however doesn't mean that the sensor is not still fully functional.
I know this question is a little off the current topic so forgive me. But I was wondering if the ECM has any ability to adjust for altitude changes in the OPEN loop areas of the AFR table. I'm assuming not, since the only pressure sensor it has is the MAP, and if the MAP read a lower pressure(because of higher altitude) it would simply go to the corresponding cell of the table, though not necessarily lean out the mixture across the board like you would want in the thinner air. I would also assume that redoing the autotune at the new altitude would change the VE tables and solve the problem?
On another note...does anyone know how long the stock narrowband O2 sensors can be expected to be accurate before needing replacement? I remember being told a long time ago that O2 sensors are really only accurate for a few years or so.
Thanks.
The Delphi ECM is speed density, fuel delivery it is based on modeled airflow. Once this model is established (predicted airfow via the VE tables) the ECM looks at various inputs, primarily RPM X MAP X IAT to calculate air mass. So yes, it can very accurately deliver fuel correctly for different altitudes in most cases. O2 sensors are not used in the fuel delivery equation, they are on the correction side of the ECM.
Last edited by fuelmoto; May 29, 2014 at 09:41 AM.
ECM has no idea about fuel changes and AFR settings in open loop regardless of whether you're at 10ft or 13,000ft so therefore it will not be able compensate properly for those changes in altitude either.
This is incorrect as the ECM bases fuel delivery exactly the same whether it is open or closed loop, does not matter if it is at 10ft or 13,000ft. The only difference in a closed loop map is there is correction based on O2 voltage.
This is incorrect as the ECM bases fuel delivery exactly the same whether it is open or closed loop, does not matter if it is at 10ft or 13,000ft. The only difference in a closed loop map is there is correction based on O2 voltage.
and doesn't that mean then that there is no correction outside of closed loop where those o2 sensors reside? That was the OPs question.
Yes I get that you set your AFRs, VEs, etc. for open loop when tuning, but again how can the ECM possibly know to auto-correct the open loop areas?
...
but again how can the ECM possibly know to auto-correct the open loop areas?
As far as I understand the ECM calculates the amount of airflow by using the values in the VE tables, the rpm and the pressure in the manifold (which it gets from the sensor).
It does not matter whether MAP values are low because of the height, the position of the twist grip or the weather situation.
The ECM only needs to know how much air flows to calculate how much fuel is needed.
For me its only measure and a little math.
"Auto correction" is not necessarily needed.
Since I am not an expert this might be wrong but this is my understanding.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.