When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Thank you for sharing this. I dont have Touring (currently m8 Heritage) and started lurking on this forum and yes I wont lie this post make me question my decision if I should jump ship to Touring.
Was this corrected on latest models as I noticed this is quite an old post.
With the introduction of the '09 Touring frame upgrades, the wobble complaints/incidents decreased, but the improvements were not a total fix. There is still no rear stabilizing link, which in grbrown's opinion (shared by many) would be the complete and proper engineering solution to the bagger wobble...
I am totally unfamiliar with the M8 bikes, as I have not owned, ridden, or worked on one... but I don't believe they have a rear stabilizing link...
Yes I am really curious about these 2017 and up Touring platform as I was considering buying one lately but this makes me worry and if this was not corrected I might stay with my 2019 Heritage as it is solid bike. From what I researched seems on Touring models engine changed but not overall design of the frame.
Hope others can chime in to let me know so I wont make move to frame with such flaw. Please share your thoughts.
Yes I am really curious about these 2017 and up Touring platform as I was considering buying one lately but this makes me worry and if this was not corrected I might stay with my 2019 Heritage as it is solid bike. From what I researched seems on Touring models engine changed but not overall design of the frame.
Hope others can chime in to let me know so I wont make move to frame with such flaw. Please share your thoughts.
Gimme a break. There is no flaw. A lot of variables can affect the stability of a bike. Air pressure, wheel alignment, tire choice, shocks, etc etc etc.
If you're interested in stability at 110 mph, its a different story, but not because there's a flaw. I've owned 3 M8 touring bikes, with exactly zero wobble issues (as has most everyone else), but I (as well as most everyone else) ride like a sane person.
Gimme a break. There is no flaw. A lot of variables can affect the stability of a bike. Air pressure, wheel alignment, tire choice, shocks, etc etc etc.
If you're interested in stability at 110 mph, its a different story, but not because there's a flaw. I've owned 3 M8 touring bikes, with exactly zero wobble issues (as has most everyone else), but I (as well as most everyone else) ride like a sane person.
Stop looking for trouble.
So are you saying all these posts here are bull$hit?
Yes I am really curious about these 2017 and up Touring platform as I was considering buying one lately but this makes me worry and if this was not corrected I might stay with my 2019 Heritage as it is solid bike. From what I researched seems on Touring models engine changed but not overall design of the frame.
Hope others can chime in to let me know so I wont make move to frame with such flaw. Please share your thoughts.
The wobble isn't much on the M8s. Sometimes feel it in high speed corners. When you feel it it's pretty subtle...it's not like a front end speed wobble which is totally different. For $200 there seem to be a couple options to stiffen things up. Alloy Art for example https://www.alloyart.com/collections...ing-stabilizer
I def wouldn't let this prevent you from buying an M8 touring. WAY better ride then the Heritage, IMO having ridden both.
With the introduction of the '09 Touring frame upgrades, the wobble complaints/incidents decreased, but the improvements were not a total fix. There is still no rear stabilizing link, which in grbrown's opinion (shared by many) would be the complete and proper engineering solution to the bagger wobble...
I am totally unfamiliar with the M8 bikes, as I have not owned, ridden, or worked on one... but I don't believe they have a rear stabilizing link...
They don't and from the 2002 TC up they still use the same swing arm bearings and spacers. The pivot shaft changed around 2011 but it is still the same size.
Many think that the reason for the 09 up frames being stronger is the reason why they seem more stable. That's not true (IMO). The main reason what they are stabler is they added about 0.4 inches of trail to the steering. The main reason for changing the frame was to make it cheaper.. The new frames were set up making it easier to be mass produced by robots. The frames still have pretty much the same rubber donuts as the ealy frames. In fact, they got rid of the single front mount and link and replaced it with donuts.. Easier assembly..
The main thing is the additional rake. It allows for more slop in the chassis before wobbles occur. It also makes the motorcycle feel heavier, harder to steer. I personally like the handling of the earlier bikes when the suspension and drivetrain / rear wheel have been tightened up.. Steering is lighter and the bikes feel quicker.. Still the newer bikes have less of an issue with the bike dancing.
Parts do wear on all HD touring. The rubber donuts collapse, swingarm bearings, wheel bearings.. With more trail, the later frames show less bad characteristics for longer.
HD did the same thing in 2006 with the Dyna frames.. Added more trail...
Parts do wear on all HD touring. The rubber donuts collapse, swingarm bearings, wheel bearings.. With more trail, the later frames show less bad characteristics for longer.
HD did the same thing in 2006 with the Dyna frames.. Added more trail...
As of 2007 the rubber donut front engine mount was changed to a much more stable design, no more rubber donut. They were known to deteriorate and shear in half, causing stability problems, but not as of 2007
As of 2007 the rubber donut front engine mount was changed to a much more stable design, no more rubber donut. They were known to deteriorate and shear in half, causing stability problems, but not as of 2007
You mean the 79D mount? In 2009 the front mount changed to 2 donuts..
You mean the 79D mount? In 2009 the front mount changed to 2 donuts..
Was referring to the top stabilizer link.
I'm not aware that those engine mounts have been particularly problematic, but of course they'd wear out over time. I highly doubt there were wobble issues attributed to those on bike when they were new.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.