When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel InjectionNeed advice on ignition issues? Questions about a tuner? Have questions about a EFI calibration or Fuel Injection? Tips on Engine Diagnostics, how to get codes, and what they mean. Find your answers here.
I'm new to PV and to tuning. I have messed around with autotune and can see that it appears to only be altering the VE tables. The AFR table stays the same.
So the way I see it, autotune just a fine tuning tool. If your base tune (AFR table, spark advance table) is not correct for your specification (cams, exhaust, intake) then you are just auto tuning a bad tune which isn't going to replace a good base tune to start with. Correct?
I haven't read all 440 pages, but it seems some people are suggesting that you can start with any tune and if you run autotune enough times it will fix it and you will end up with a good result.
There are good starter cals and there are bad ones. The VE's are easily dealt with by making additional AT runs. they will eventually come around IF your bike is clean, meaning no leaks. The biggest problem is when someone starts out with a cal that has aggressive timing. If the starter map is close it's a non-issue. If you're unsure, I would suggest starting out with one of the DJ "stock improved" maps. Just do a mellow first run to get everything going in the right direction. After that, tune away. The bottom line is try to start out with a cal as close as possible. If someone can't find something close, better to start out with something below your build, rather than a starter cal that is way too aggressive. 2 or 3 extra AT runs is better than running ***** to the wall with an aggressive starter cal, and risking damage. The basic process is VE's, timing, then one or two VE runs to seal the deal. The only other suggestion I would give someone that is using a starter cal that is way off is to do a mellow (not ******* it, mellow riding) datalog and see what the timing knock shows.
without an accurate ve table it doesnt matter what afr you want to run, you simply wont get it.
Air Fuel Ratio
if your ecm thinks there is a certain amount of air it will add a specific amount of fuel to achieve the desired afr.
if there is less or more air than what the ecm is expecting the added fuel will not equal the desired afr.
for stock bikes or slightly modified (pipes, intake) the base map may be off but that just means doing more runs to get the ve table accurately mapped.
spark is a bit more involved and better left for someone else to explain. personally i only changed my spark tables a little cause of the amount of knock i was getting.... i may be getting close but i am not ready to fine tune my spark tables yet
I'll drink to getting VE's dialed in before any other changes start to happen.
does anyone happen to have a PV map for a 96 mike with SE204 cams installed they wouldn't mind sharing? I have one but would like to compare Timing tables.
I'm now glad you posted this. When you do an AT and let the unit make the changes you won't see anything in the 750 row. I experimented with a 176 cal this morning.
AT letting PV make changes = no VE correction to 750 row.
Datalog tune using PV Log Tuner = change to 750 row / 0 column.
i tried looking at this through log tuner and i can see what you are talking about.
is there something i should do aside from using the save log button on the data log screen to see the extra information (like knock, hit count etc) ?
the extra info i am looking for simply wasnt there to see after calc tune (log tuner)... the tables all showed up just not the info.
i assume i have to add extra channels to be recorded but i am not very familiar with this.... my experience with pv started after autotune came out
one last thing.... the auto tune version was a little different than the log tune version (same tune) after calculating, applying and saving... could this be attributed to different settings between the 2 processes (like min/max hit count per cell being used for example) ?
Try running a datalog at the same time your using AT. Then load the log into Log Tuner and go through the manual process of updating a new cal. You don't have to save it as a new cal but it will show you hit count. Even better if you had any knock retard you can see that also.
Here's a suggestion, right, wrong, good or bad. Go out for a 45 minute NORMAL ride. Then look at the datalog and see what is YOUR normal riding area. Take blue painters tape and make a box of that area then go out and max the crap out of that area. Do it 3 times and compare. After the 3rd run you should be around 3% or less. This won't be your final tune, but it's a way to see how your data in that area is affecting your tune. If you get, lets say 70+ hits on each run, and your tune is swinging, then you have something going on with the bike. If, after 3 runs of hitting 70+ in that bax and your tune stays within a couple % then you can rule out thebike. Operator error is the problem, or you're not reading the results correctly.
Another point to the above is this. When someone makes the first AT run it's not a bad idea to do a pretty mellow run. This helps in getting your VE's going in the right direction. Start out with a datalog run and use Log Tuner to build the new cal. PV Log Tuner will show you if you have any outrageous knock retard going with the starter cal. It's an extra step, but it gives someone a decent idea of how far off the starter cal really is. Ex: You see timing being oulled out in bucketloads, then one would be wise to make a correction before tuning.
As far as increasing how much correction you expect: I'm not a big fan of that approach, unless you're maxing out hits. It's like the geek saying of garbage in equals garbage out. I wouldn't trust letting the PV make a huge correction on limited hits. Yes, it will correct, but how valid is the big correction based on limited data. I'd rather make extra AT runs.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.