When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel InjectionNeed advice on ignition issues? Questions about a tuner? Have questions about a EFI calibration or Fuel Injection? Tips on Engine Diagnostics, how to get codes, and what they mean. Find your answers here.
So....why do we need a converted tune for two products coming from the same company? Delphi can already read the voltages. I'm just curious why a handful years ago the PV was so great at 14.6 and now folks need to outlay another 4 bills to tune the areas they could never reach with the PV? I' mean lets be real, just for a moment. Read years of threads of folks saying they can't collect data in the far reaching areas. The response was...don't worry about it, you don't ride there anyway". Now all of a sudden they can reach these areas? Come on now. You been around around long enough right? If someone couldn't hit these areas with PV, be it 1 or 2, why do they need Target Tune? I await your response......
The PV is very good tuner that can be used on its own to change values from your tune and flash back to the bike, It can use feedback the original narrowband O2 sensors to adjust the VE values in the closed loop range (O2 sensor limitation not PV) to adjust a tune to how a bike flows air giving you a better tune. Since it was introduced you could also add an autotune module to tune "those areas" outside closed loop. No change there but after tuning you could go back to the narrow band sensors and let the ECM manage the closed loop areas as you ride. Now Target tune is introduced and by changing a couple of settings in the base map you can tune in closed and open loop areas plus let the ECM adjust as you ride using the feedback from the wideband sensors. Do you need it? that's an individual choice, one can ride the bike like it comes from the factory or make changes to get a better ride. Lots of choices
So, what do you recommend he does with 30 and below map VE's? It's easy to say ignore the VE's, but ...... depending on elevation, temps, crap gas....what do you think he should do with the VE's on decel? Your response will be enlightening for the DIY'res out here.
I did not say ignore the VE's, I noted not to use Auto Tune for tuning the decel area as it is obvious from the VE tables this user posted there is a reversion issue that is being over corrected, significantly. In most cases the decel area could be considered volatile from a closed loop standpoint; there is reversion, various strategies related to decel fuel cut, and many other variables that are not closed loop friendly. When developing calibrations in most cases once VE is established for the cruise and low RPM regions of the VE tables we start with extending/blending the areas to the left, and then attend to any decel related issues from there.
Originally Posted by stailjim61
So....why do we need a converted tune for two products coming from the same company? Delphi can already read the voltages. I'm just curious why a handful years ago the PV was so great at 14.6 and now folks need to outlay another 4 bills to tune the areas they could never reach with the PV? I' mean lets be real, just for a moment. Read years of threads of folks saying they can't collect data in the far reaching areas. The response was...don't worry about it, you don't ride there anyway". Now all of a sudden they can reach these areas? Come on now. You been around around long enough right? If someone couldn't hit these areas with PV, be it 1 or 2, why do they need Target Tune? I await your response......
You cannot simply plug in widebands to the ECM; because the hardware is changed, many aspect of the calibration need to be changed. Hardware wise the ECM needs to be able to interpret 0-5V from the wideband controller rather then 0-1V with factory O2's, then you have the heater circuits, how the integrator and AFF operate, and how all that data is handled. Essentially all of the closed loop related tables running in the background of the calibration are changed to allow closed loop with the widebands. As far as data collection, because we can now capture AF data from a much broader range (10.0-17.0 AFR rather than 14.4-15.0) we can use the widebands for the higher RPM and higher load areas. We have never preached using narrowband tuning for high RPM high load areas, it is simply a limitation of the stock ECM and factory O2 sensors.
Fairly new to the PV but a good deal of past experience with TTS. What is the best way to tune the spark timing? In TTS I could do data runs and see everything available. Is there a way to do the same with PV? I think I can datalog a few channels, but not sure if I can get more or set up a template for repeatable logs.
Also should I be looking at spark timing with a test flat 14.6 afr like TTS or leave my current tune for timing? I would like to increase timing in a few rough spots and watch logs for auto knock timing retard. So I can get closer to correct.
Part of my issue or concern is I installed the HD 113 kit and dynojet does not have a base tune for that kit so I started from the CVO 110 and adjusted displacement. I'm sure the cams are differnt but can't find a good starter for the 113 with the se266e cams. It's running pretty good but have a bad cough at about 1500-1750rpm. Auto tune tries to lean it out and that makes it worse. Read the spark is probably too retarded and unburned fuel causing sensor to think rich. Advanced some timing in quick tune and it seems to be a bit better but plug strap looks like it's plenty advanced, just can't tell at what conditions.
Any suggestions or advice from those that have been here a while?
Any input is appreciated. This is a great learning site for PV. A bit surprised dynojet doesn't update guides like TTS does. The latest available was in 2012. Seem to be a bit behind but I sure like not dragging the laptop along.
I did not say ignore the VE's, I noted not to use Auto Tune for tuning the decel area as it is obvious from the VE tables this user posted there is a reversion issue that is being over corrected, significantly. In most cases the decel area could be considered volatile from a closed loop standpoint; there is reversion, various strategies related to decel fuel cut, and many other variables that are not closed loop friendly. When developing calibrations in most cases once VE is established for the cruise and low RPM regions of the VE tables we start with extending/blending the areas to the left, and then attend to any decel related issues from there.
You cannot simply plug in widebands to the ECM; because the hardware is changed, many aspect of the calibration need to be changed. Hardware wise the ECM needs to be able to interpret 0-5V from the wideband controller rather then 0-1V with factory O2's, then you have the heater circuits, how the integrator and AFF operate, and how all that data is handled. Essentially all of the closed loop related tables running in the background of the calibration are changed to allow closed loop with the widebands. As far as data collection, because we can now capture AF data from a much broader range (10.0-17.0 AFR rather than 14.4-15.0) we can use the widebands for the higher RPM and higher load areas. We have never preached using narrowband tuning for high RPM high load areas, it is simply a limitation of the stock ECM and factory O2 sensors.
I still don't see where any of what you posted affects 90% of riders. Most folks have trouble reaching those outlying cells when running basic tuning runs. So, what's TT going to do for them? Not to mention how irresponsible it is to sell a product that, if used as described, is a huge safety factor on any street worldwide. To tune where you ride, and a little beyond, I'm fine with. Beyond that, the rear wheel needs to stay on a drum. There's way too many stupid people on 4 wheels and just as many stupid riders out there. Morons out on the street trying to fill cells at 6k and 90 map. Seeing the warning for off road use only isn't going to stop these fools. The sad part is nobody will ever know that these fools were riding like morons to collect data at outlying cells....all they do is pick up the pieces and bag them. Don't get me wrong. I'm all for the DIY'ers and technological advances. I hate to say it, but, someone will end up getting hurt.
Fairly new to the PV but a good deal of past experience with TTS. What is the best way to tune the spark timing? In TTS I could do data runs and see everything available. Is there a way to do the same with PV? I think I can datalog a few channels, but not sure if I can get more or set up a template for repeatable logs.
Also should I be looking at spark timing with a test flat 14.6 afr like TTS or leave my current tune for timing? I would like to increase timing in a few rough spots and watch logs for auto knock timing retard. So I can get closer to correct.
Part of my issue or concern is I installed the HD 113 kit and dynojet does not have a base tune for that kit so I started from the CVO 110 and adjusted displacement. I'm sure the cams are differnt but can't find a good starter for the 113 with the se266e cams. It's running pretty good but have a bad cough at about 1500-1750rpm. Auto tune tries to lean it out and that makes it worse. Read the spark is probably too retarded and unburned fuel causing sensor to think rich. Advanced some timing in quick tune and it seems to be a bit better but plug strap looks like it's plenty advanced, just can't tell at what conditions.
Any suggestions or advice from those that have been here a while?
Any input is appreciated. This is a great learning site for PV. A bit surprised dynojet doesn't update guides like TTS does. The latest available was in 2012. Seem to be a bit behind but I sure like not dragging the laptop along.
Brian
Timing has been discussed over and over. Do a search, there's plenty to answer your questions.
A thread search for timing or spark advance of over 7500 posts is pretty useless. A lot of key words but much useless guidance. Can you off an answer or point me to a specific post?
Fairly new to the PV but a good deal of past experience with TTS. What is the best way to tune the spark timing? In TTS I could do data runs and see everything available. Is there a way to do the same with PV? I think I can datalog a few channels, but not sure if I can get more or set up a template for repeatable logs.
Also should I be looking at spark timing with a test flat 14.6 afr like TTS or leave my current tune for timing? I would like to increase timing in a few rough spots and watch logs for auto knock timing retard. So I can get closer to correct.
Part of my issue or concern is I installed the HD 113 kit and dynojet does not have a base tune for that kit so I started from the CVO 110 and adjusted displacement. I'm sure the cams are differnt but can't find a good starter for the 113 with the se266e cams. It's running pretty good but have a bad cough at about 1500-1750rpm. Auto tune tries to lean it out and that makes it worse. Read the spark is probably too retarded and unburned fuel causing sensor to think rich. Advanced some timing in quick tune and it seems to be a bit better but plug strap looks like it's plenty advanced, just can't tell at what conditions.
Any suggestions or advice from those that have been here a while?
Any input is appreciated. This is a great learning site for PV. A bit surprised dynojet doesn't update guides like TTS does. The latest available was in 2012. Seem to be a bit behind but I sure like not dragging the laptop along.
Brian
Brian, welcome to the forum and thread about the PV. There are some 3rd party applications that people are using for the newer bikes. They've been mentioned in the not to distant past I'll try to go back and find them for you. I think ne was called Megalog Viewer.
There is also a older, but powerful seperate application that was used pre - Autotune technology being built into the PV called Log Tuner. I've heard this does not work on the new CAN bus bikes, but I'm not sure. It allowed you datalog and and identify spark knock events and from there you could retard timing manually for those cells or surrounding cells, or you could use a small calculater that the app provided to build new spark tables and import into your tune.
I'll try to help you find the more up to date apps that might help you.
The focus lately has been on this new Target Tune technology using wide band sensors and real time tuning. I'm not sure what this new technology might provide for timing.
A thread search for timing or spark advance of over 7500 posts is pretty useless. A lot of key words but much useless guidance. Can you off an answer or point me to a specific post?
Go here and read a bit about "myTune" software, which might be helpful.
My Tune works great and the price to register is worth the price. I also use it to spot check my VEs. I actually prefer the results over the PV. The amount is not significant but I noticed that my CLI and AFF are happier.
Fairly new to the PV but a good deal of past experience with TTS. What is the best way to tune the spark timing? In TTS I could do data runs and see everything available. Is there a way to do the same with PV? I think I can datalog a few channels, but not sure if I can get more or set up a template for repeatable logs.
Also should I be looking at spark timing with a test flat 14.6 afr like TTS or leave my current tune for timing? I would like to increase timing in a few rough spots and watch logs for auto knock timing retard. So I can get closer to correct.
Part of my issue or concern is I installed the HD 113 kit and dynojet does not have a base tune for that kit so I started from the CVO 110 and adjusted displacement. I'm sure the cams are differnt but can't find a good starter for the 113 with the se266e cams. It's running pretty good but have a bad cough at about 1500-1750rpm. Auto tune tries to lean it out and that makes it worse. Read the spark is probably too retarded and unburned fuel causing sensor to think rich. Advanced some timing in quick tune and it seems to be a bit better but plug strap looks like it's plenty advanced, just can't tell at what conditions.
Any suggestions or advice from those that have been here a while?
Any input is appreciated. This is a great learning site for PV. A bit surprised dynojet doesn't update guides like TTS does. The latest available was in 2012. Seem to be a bit behind but I sure like not dragging the laptop along.
Brian
I am working on putting together some updated Power Vision documentation as well as some advanced tuning techniques using the Megalogview software and will be putting it on our website, its going to be a little bit as we are currently up to our eyeballs with Target Tune and the 2016 bikes being released. If anyone needs specific assistance they are welcome to contact us.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.