Power Vision Information Thread
They do not last for ever the head units go bad in time . The touch screens stop working ect. Once out of warranty you are out of luck with it.
Have one in a box here some where screen comes and goes.
The one I currently have is 2 years old and the great extended warranty Fuel moto offers has run out. Why would I pay $200 to add it to my new bike , knowing it will not likely last until my next trade in 1 year 11 months.
I would rather just give it to who ever buys the one I traded in and tell them enjoy. Should I decide to go with another PV I would with out a doubt purchase it from Fuel Moto.
At this time with 1200 plus miles on my 2016 RGU wet head it is running flawlessly. I do want to give it some time before I mess with it to much. Have not chosen pipes yet and the Fuel Moto 2-1-2 ceramic coated heads are hanging on the wall waiting to go on.
Dealer I go to is one I have done business with for a life time purchased many new bikes from them they treat me right . The Tuner they have knows what he is doing been at it a while.
My attraction to the PV2 is not as much the tuner as all of the others things it can do.
This is discouraging
Im on the fence
I have a PCV and autotune.
But I want to monitor AFR while I ride (Real Time)
My options are
#1 POD 300 added to my current system
#2 Innovate Motorsports DLG-1 gauge install and pull the autotune
#3 Trade my PCV for a Vision and maybe upgrade to the Target tune.
I was really leaning toward Option 3 till I read the above quoted post.
If the PV only lasts a few years Im prob gonna do option 2
I know the Gauge in the dash will outlive the 02 sensors.
Anyone else experience issues with the PV having problems after 2 years?
Last edited by Makdaddy; Sep 22, 2015 at 01:44 PM.
Im on the fence
I have a PCV and autotune.
But I want to monitor AFR while I ride (Real Time)
My options are
#1 POD 300 added to my current system
#2 Innovate Motorsports DLG-1 gauge install and pull the autotune
#3 Trade my PCV for a Vision and maybe upgrade to the Target tune.
I was really leaning toward Option 3 till I read the above quoted post.
If the PV only lasts a few years Im prob gonna do option 2
I know the Gauge in the dash will outlive the 02 sensors.
Anyone else experience issues with the PV having problems after 2 years?

Jamie Long / Fuel Moto USA
The USA's Leader V-Twin EFI & Performance www.fuelmotousa.com
Contact 920-423-3309
Email jamie@fuelmotousa.com
It does appear that something is messed up down low.
see
http://www.nbs-stl.com/HarleyTuning/...tle%20Bust.png
The plot on the right should be generally a straight line.
Here is an example of a well tuned bike. It happens to be running Dynojet Target Tune.
http://www.nbs-stl.com/HarleyTuning/...%20vs%20DC.png
Andy
I am not able to get the O2 voltage or the CLI to show any data when I datalog. I think this is because my bike is a 2005 which is an open loop system that does not use the narrowband O2 sensors. I am using the Auutotune Pro with the wideband sensors to tune it. It will only allow me to log AFR or Lambda from the wideband O2 sensors. I went ahead and logged AFR but I don't know if that will help or not.
Hopefully this datalog has enough info that it can give you an idea of what the issue is and how to solve it.
Once again, thanks for the help.

Thanks for the input
Im still debating
But this helps
I am not able to get the O2 voltage or the CLI to show any data when I datalog. I think this is because my bike is a 2005 which is an open loop system that does not use the narrowband O2 sensors. I am using the Auutotune Pro with the wideband sensors to tune it. It will only allow me to log AFR or Lambda from the wideband O2 sensors. I went ahead and logged AFR but I don't know if that will help or not.
Hopefully this datalog has enough info that it can give you an idea of what the issue is and how to solve it.
Once again, thanks for the help.
That little hiccup spot occurs in a very tight range of RPM, MAP and TP. RPM is between 1800 and 2200, MAP is between 26-32 KPa, and throttle position is less than 0.5% - so closed. You knew the RPM range and TP, but the MAP gives a little more info.
Now at that RPM with a closed throttle, I'd expect to see low MAP, but you've got a cruising MAP with throttle maybe 5%-10%. I'm thinking intake reversion (duh-duh -duhhhh - Just like Jamie said, whatcha know...).
Again, just like Jamie said, you can set the MAP min to about 30 KPa and it PV should ignore that area.
Here's the MAPx RPM vs Duty cycle front without filter...
And here's the same graph with only those pints less than 30 KPa...
And here it is with only those pints greater than 35 KPa.
Hate to say it but it looks like your cut off is about 35 KPa... anything less than 35 left that "hump".
Last edited by Coug; Sep 22, 2015 at 08:33 PM.
That little hiccup spot occurs in a very tight range of RPM, MAP and TP. RPM is between 1800 and 2200, MAP is between 26-32 KPa, and throttle position is less than 0.5% - so closed. You knew the RPM range and TP, but the MAP gives a little more info.
Now at that RPM with a closed throttle, I'd expect to see low MAP, but you've got a cruising MAP with throttle maybe 5%-10%. I'm thinking intake reversion (duh-duh -duhhhh - Just like Jamie said, whatcha know...).
Again, just like Jamie said, you can set the MAP min to about 30 KPa and it PV should ignore that area.
Thanks
The Best of Harley-Davidson for Lifelong Riders
The only other thing I can think of is manually inputting the VEs for those two areas using adjacent cells, or interpolating between cells. It is in the 0% TP so little to gain or loose...
Here's the graph with only TP < 1% removed...
Looks almost like a straight line...
Last edited by Coug; Sep 22, 2015 at 08:46 PM.
The only other thing I can think of is manually inputting the VEs for those two areas using adjacent cells, or interpolating between cells. It is in the 0% TP so little to gain or loose...
Once I manually input the VE's and go on some more autotune runs, do I just continue to manually adjust those cells back down every few autotunes until I get less than 5% change in the VE's?







